THE KRITRNA PLATFORM

Selection is the question.
Evidence is the way forward.

For a selected premature stop, there can be many candidate designs and several reasons why a promising molecule may not work in a cell. KritRNA is developing a platform to help make candidate choice more informed, explainable and experimentally actionable.

THE PLATFORMIN DEVELOPMENT · BUILT TO BE TESTED

Design the molecule.
Understand its world.

Making a candidate is one challenge.
Choosing the right one is another.

We are developing two connected engines to help make that choice more informed. One focuses on the candidate. The other considers the translation system it enters. Both are designed to learn from experiments.

ENGINE 01 / CANDIDATE DESIGN01

From a mutation
to a testable choice.

Engine 01 is being developed to explore suppressor-tRNA candidates in the context of a selected nonsense mutation. It brings molecular suitability and the intended restoration goal into a common decision process.

Intended output
An explainable candidate shortlist, its supporting evidence and the questions to test next.
What earns confidence
Prospective experiments in a relevant biological context.
Understand the design engine ↗
ENGINE 02 / SYSTEMS THINKING02
BIOLOGY IS CONNECTED

Message availability, translation, quality control and protein output influence one another.

Illustrative 3D network · not proprietary topology or model output.

From one molecule
to connected consequences.

Engine 02 is a developing systems model of translation. It asks how a candidate may interact with message availability, ribosome behaviour, termination, quality control and the production of useful protein.

Intended output
Testable hypotheses about biological dependencies, potential bottlenecks and the measurements that matter.
What earns confidence
Experimental challenge and calibration—not an impressive network picture.
Explore the systems perspective ↗
01

Design

Begin with the biological question.

Explore candidate possibilities for a defined mutation and intended protein-restoration goal.

02

Measure

Keep the experiment in context.

Assess readthrough alongside protein output, function, cellular response and effects at normal stop codons.

03

Rank

Make the next choice more informed.

Develop experimentally challengeable prioritisation with a clear rationale and explicit uncertainty.

04

Expand

Carry forward what the evidence supports.

Use each research programme to inform the next while recognising that delivery and disease biology remain programme-specific.

The engines support a design–test–learn programme. Functional protein restoration, delivery and safety are experimental questions, not outputs that a model can certify.

ENGINE 01 / CANDIDATE DESIGN

A better shortlist.
A clearer next experiment.

The intended starting point is a defined gene, nonsense mutation and protein-restoration goal. The intended destination is a scientifically reasoned shortlist of candidates for testing.

The engine is being developed to bring molecular suitability and biological context into the same conversation. It asks whether a candidate is plausible as a tRNA, whether its intended activity makes sense in the target context, and what evidence would strengthen or challenge that choice.

What a candidate report should explain

Why a design is worth testing, which observations support that decision and which questions remain open.

What ranking is meant to achieve

Prioritise experimental effort and make assumptions visible before resources are committed.

How the engine should improve

Use clearly attributed experimental outcomes to challenge earlier choices and inform the next round.

CONNECTED BIOLOGY

The right molecule must work in the right context.

These public biological questions explain why translation therapeutics needs an integrated approach. Safety and useful protein function run across all four.

01 / Charging

Can the tRNA carry its intended amino acid?

A tRNA must be recognised and charged by an appropriate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. Recognition of a stop codon alone is not sufficient.

02 / Termination competition

Can translation continue at the selected stop?

The suppressor tRNA competes with the machinery that normally ends translation. The local sequence and the state of the ribosome matter.

03 / Message survival

Is there enough mRNA left to read?

Nonsense-mediated decay can reduce the available transcript. Its effect varies with the gene, transcript architecture and cellular context.

04 / Delivery

Can the candidate reach the right cells?

A promising molecular design still needs a credible route to the relevant tissue and an effective intracellular exposure.

BUILDING TOWARD GLOBAL SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS

Quality is built into how the work is judged.

Our ambition is a platform that earns trust through prospective evidence, traceability and meaningful experimental choices. These are development standards, not a claim of completed validation.

01

Mechanistic relevance

Start with how translation works, not an isolated sequence score.

02

Comparable evidence

Preserve the biological and assay context behind every measurement.

03

Explainable choices

Make the rationale for an experimental shortlist understandable and challengeable.

04

Prospective testing

Test whether prioritisation helps on new experiments, not only on data already seen.

05

Safety alongside activity

Consider normal-stop effects and cellular responses alongside protein restoration.

06

Learning with provenance

Keep a traceable connection between a scientific question, the experiment and the next decision.

The model proposes.
The experiment decides.

We are building a design–test–learn programme in which readthrough, full-length protein, protein function, transcript availability and cellular effects remain distinct questions. Scientific, assay, disease-model and delivery collaborations help turn those questions into evidence.

Build the evidence with us ↗
Explore the translation-system perspective ↗